Welcome to the Witnessing Space
Notes on seeing clearly
Why we suffer
We suffer far less from what happens to us than from what our minds make of it.
This is not a new insight. Epictetus, the freed slave and Stoic philosopher, said it two thousand years ago; the Upanishads described it millennia earlier; Buddha taught it with precision; Nietzsche and Viktor Frankl wove it in their philosophies. Yet we continue to mistake our thoughts for truth and the stories we tell ourselves for reality. We worry about the future long before it arrives and relive the past long after it has passed. These habits are so universal that we rarely stop to question them.
Witnessing suffering up close
My work as a psychiatrist has brought me into close contact with deep suffering. Every day I meet people who are distressed, dysfunctional, and damaged. I see the harm people do to each other, what society does to people, what parents do to children and children to parents, and what we do to ourselves. Suffering can take many forms. An abused, suicidal adolescent who no longer feels loved. A man who feels himself a failure and has lost all hope. A woman who destroys all she had in an episode of manic grandiosity. A lonely individual who believes that he is being controlled through a chip in his brain. A sixteen-year-old from a broken home who, having started smoking cannabis at the age of ten, now constantly hears voices telling him he is worthless and should kill himself.
Suffering is real. I see it very clearly. My role requires me to examine it dispassionately while holding the pain of the sufferer with compassion. In over 35 years of sitting with the suffering of others, I have come to recognise my own afflictions and their sources.
What science explains- and what it cannot
Modern neuroscience and psychiatry have given us extraordinary tools: we can map the brain with remarkable precision, watch neurones fire in real time, and catalogue the chemical orchestration behind thought and emotion. Yet when it comes to the lived experience of grief, shame, love, fear, guilt, or despair, we still ask the same old questions: Who is the “I” that thinks, feels, and suffers? What is the mind? Why does understanding not always liberate us?
Neuroscience studies the brain as an object. Ancient contemplative traditions attempted to understand the mind from within. Psychiatry occupies both worlds: the mind as a suffering object and the conscious awareness of the individual seeking relief. My work has also taught me that human suffering is rarely caused by the world alone. It arises instead from the way mind meets experience. While the mind can observe the world with extraordinary intelligence and in exquisite detail, it can remain strangely blind to itself.
Why this blog exists: an invitation
This blog sits at the intersection of the brain, mind, self and suffering. It is not a memoir, nor a manifesto for self-improvement. It is more like a diary of field observations - an attempt to think about these in public, slowly, carefully, and without theatrics or scratching at humanity’s wounds. Some reflections will be clinical, some philosophical, some spiritual and some cultural. Clarity requires multiple perspectives, and we rarely arrive at it all at once.
The blog is an invitation to pause long enough to notice how experience is organised moment by moment. How the mind shapes meaning and attributes it to experience. How suffering often arises not from events but from our entanglement with the stories we attach to them. Science has provided us with astonishing new facts but precious few wisdoms. I make no promises of enlightenment, offer no recipes for happiness, and provide no certainty to the baffling, enigmatic, and profoundly mysterious nature of what it is to be human. When it comes to the self, clarity often comes from subtracting rather than adding. Something falls away, and what remains is simple awareness, unburdened by narrative. It is an invitation to see clearly. To be aware of awareness.
You do not need to become more.
You need to be less encumbered.
You don’t need to work harder.
You need to stop strengthening the worker.
You don’t need to climb higher.
You need to step off the ladder.
A space for dialogue, not agreement
You do not need to agree with everything I write. Agreement is not the point. I am interested in whether a sentence makes you stop, look again, or recognise something you had not articulated before. Or disagree and make me look at my assumptions with fresh eyes.
In this series, I will write about the construction of self, the nature of suffering, agency and freedom, consciousness and awareness, and what it means to live with clarity in an uncertain world. I write not to persuade but to witness ideas as they reveal themselves.
If this kind of seeing interests you, you are in the right place.

This is a beautifully held reflection. I really appreciate how you honour the reality of suffering without collapsing it into either explanation or consolation. The distinction you draw between what science can map and what awareness must notice from within feels especially important.
Your line about clarity coming from subtracting rather than adding stayed with me. It resonates with some of the questions I’ve been sitting with recently around awareness, identity, and loosening our entanglement with inner narratives. Thank you for offering a space that invites seeing rather than agreement. 🌿
Great piece, Prof. Swaran. It provoked all sorts of thought while I was reading it. I thought of Jungian psychology and of understanding suffering as a meaningful and instructive guide for psychic growth, in addition to seeing it as something to transcend, manage, or reduce through conscious understanding and detachment. It also reminded me of a teaching I once heard at my local church. The priest lamented that this world inflicts suffering even on Jesus Christ. He then asked us: if it causes so much suffering even to God himself, what could we expect it would do to us? So I thought if Christian theology sees suffering, at least to an extent, as something to be endured or embraced, without endless pondering on conscious or unconscious regulation. Anyways, it was a fun and thought-provoking read. I look forward to many more of your pieces. Congratulations.